Running the same thing across multiple vises? Or fixture stations?į-CAM handles this with a "multiple fixture document". As long as I keep maintenance current.Įdit: I just thought of one other HUGE benefit of F-CAM. Older perpetual licenses are grandfathered in, from what they explained to me. Seymour is again correct though, they are going subscription based very soon, if not already have. TURN FEATURE CAM FULLAnd, quickly determined, I needed the full option. TURN FEATURE CAM TRIALI ran a trial of light for a couple weeks. They do have two different levels of 3-D. They don't give that great of a discount on a second seat either. But, I have full 3-D, 4th-axis, and turning. And, historically my maintenance has been a fuzz over $1500/yr. M-CAM will let you tweak precious seconds out way easier than F-CAM. TURN FEATURE CAM SOFTWAREEven if you have to spend more time at the software tweaking? Run a lot of production? Big volumes where every second of cycle time counts. Having used both, my opinion is: in a shop that does a lot of "new" parts, F-CAM is the way to go. One of the biggest pluses M-CAM has over F-CAM? The tool-crib! F-CAM does some really stupid shit with their cribs. And, fine tuning that control is a little easier. M-CAM can give more infinite control over the actual tool-path. But, if you have a solid, it's just that much faster.Īnd if you are savvy with using different layers (think levels in M-CAM) you can keep a very organized, easy to look at, part file.ĭrawing (geometry creation) in F-CAM is way-way-way easier/faster. I have made some pretty dang complex stuff in F-CAM with simple geometry. This curve creating is essentially the same as chaining in M-CAM. In MasterCAM, you "chain" your geometry to create tool-path. I will add a little bit to help the masses understand the difference between how tool-path is driven between the two. Unless someone is in the "know", I don't think the actual annual figures have been published yet for the various packages.You are correct on all counts Seymour! Unless someone is in the "know", I don't think the actual annual figures have been published yet for the various packages. Plain mill with feature recognition used to be in the 'hood of $4-5K - ish.ģD has different levels, ranging from 2K to 6K depending on what you need.Īll that however is now or soon to be out the window as FeatureCAM ( now AutoDesk product ) will be an annual subscription-only. Now to the OP, that is a difficult question. Well, you can just cut/paste a "feature" from another setup or another file or from a template, redefine the underlying curve and bang, you've just createdĪ brand new feature that inherits everything from the original, except it will be in a new location and of a completely different shape. Once the curve and then the toolpath is created, you can modify, move, or delete even the underlying geometry, and yet, your toolpath remainsĪs it was because it's based off of a curve ( actually you can use plain jane geometry as well but. You use the solids, surfaces etc to create curves, and then turn the curves into toolpaths ( Features ). The company invested more than 100k € during the last 3 years and they are still happy and growing.I really don't know what you're trying to say there AtomįC will work from either solids, surfaces, 2D or 3D geometry. TURN FEATURE CAM UPDATELong story short, because of our good software, reputation, a complete solution that meets their needs, and the mistake FeatureCAM made with their update policies, they gave us a chance and we took it. Shortly after, they decided to invest in a third seat and an education solution for their trainees. They started with two seats of SolidCAM for milling and turning. In addition, SolidCAM has the best roughing module with iMachining3D. They mainly worked with milling machines, but they also had mill-turn and milling machines with turning options.ĭuring our demonstration, we were able to convince them, that SolidCAM is the right solution because the software is easy to use and has a powerful mill-turn solution. So the company decided to check if their current FeatureCAM CAM solution is the one they wanted to work with in the future.ĭue to SolidCAM's good reputation in the CAD/CAM market in Germany and the fact that their apprentices have been working with SolidCAM in school, they got in contact with us and we prepared a demonstration at the customer site. So this company would have been forced to pay 10.000 € for the first year and after that 5.000 € annually if they had made the deal. Until FeatureCAM decided to switch from perpetual licenses to rent licenses. I want to tell you a success story of a now happy SolidCAM customer of ours - it happened three years ago.īefore we made our shot, the customer worked for several years with FeatureCAM. Win against Competitor FeatureCAM, because of powerful SolidCAM Mill-Turn and iMachining3D
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |